Axial's mid-year survey of 79 lower-middle-market dealmakers found that 57% of deals that died in the first half of 2026 died over valuation expectations — up from 28% a year ago. Every other deal-killer got smaller: diligence findings fell from 25% to 10%, financing constraints from 18% to 8%, macro worries from 21% to 9%. The market isn't killing deals anymore. The gap between what owners believe and what buyers can verify is.
Here's what makes that gap worth closing from your side rather than by cutting your price: 45% of buyers say they'll still stretch on valuation for a quality asset, and their single biggest complaint — 40% of them — is that they can't find enough quality businesses to buy. Quality is scarce, and scarce gets the stretch bid. But "quality" to a buyer doesn't just mean a good business. It means a provable one.
And the penalty for showing up unprovable isn't a lower multiple — it's worse paper. As one advisor in the survey put it: "While headline multiples remained stable, we've seen increased use of seller financing, earnouts, holdbacks." Readers of the last two issues know exactly what those instruments cost: 88% of sellers don't get the whole check at closing, and earnouts pay out roughly 21 cents on the dollar. The unprepared seller gets the same headline number — with more of it held back, contingent, or graded by the buyer after closing.
What a year of preparation actually buys you:
| What the buyer will test | What it costs you unprepared | What a year fixes |
|---|---|---|
| Financial hygiene | A quality-of-earnings review haircuts your EBITDA — and every dollar it cuts is multiplied | Clean monthly closes, documented add-backs, revenue recognition a QoE confirms instead of contests |
| Owner dependence | A longer earnout and a longer tie-in — the buyer prices the risk that the business is you | A second layer of management with real authority, and a business that ran without you for two quarters |
| Customer concentration | Structure and escrow — contingent dollars against the account they fear losing | Contracted renewals, broadened accounts, and proof the relationship belongs to the company |
Then the sale itself takes another year — run as a process, not an event. Our 9-step selling process runs from the benchmark opinion of value and preparation, through team building, the memorandum and buyer research, two phases of confidential marketing, buyer screening, due diligence, and closing. Each step exists to keep multiple qualified buyers at the table — because competition, not negotiation, is what moves both the price and the structure in your favor. The survey shows why patience is now structural: buyers report "everything is just taking a little longer," and deals dying of sheer process fatigue doubled this year to 16%. Sellers who start prepared move through diligence while tired sellers stall in it.
Put the two together and the arithmetic is simple. The preparation year is likely the highest-paid year of your working life: every point of EBITDA you can prove — not claim, prove — gets multiplied at 5–7x in the check. Time and effort that pays off directly, and the only input is starting early enough.
If your target exit is roughly two years out, the work starts this quarter: get a benchmark valuation so you know your real number, then pick the three things a buyer will discount first — usually financial hygiene, owner dependence, and customer concentration — and put a fix-by date on each. A year from now, that list is the difference between the stretch bid and the earnout.
The first step of the preparation year is knowing your number. Bring us your financials — or just your idea of your number — and we'll give you a confidential benchmark valuation plus the specific list of what a buyer would discount today, while there's still time to fix it.
Schedule a Free Call